when asked about which presidential candidates shares his views the most Legendary Investor Jim Rogers responded : "that's not worthy of your time , because whoever they are it wouldn't matter probably it will hurt them if I told you I was in favor , looking at the lot the ones who understand the situation better than others are Ron Paul and Gary Johnson , and I am sure I did not say that .... Adam Smith would be a good president he's been gone a long long time but he certainly understood how the world works .....
JIM ROGERS BLOG is An Unofficial Tracking Blog of Global Investor Wall Street King and author Jim Rogers , his investments speeches interviews ideas and much more....
Adam Smith was not so naive as to accept all the BS about a "free market"
ReplyDeleteAs he state "Masters are always and everywhere in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform combination, not to raise the wages of labor... Masters, too sometimes enter into combinations to sink the wages of labour even below this rate... in all such disputes the master can hold out much longer."
Forced "free trade" is a good example of the above, debt-money is another slavery by capital, and a lack of a"factor" balance between labor and capital in society means we sink into totalitarian capitalist depressions, and utter fascism.
Kent Welton,
TheCenterForBalance.org
Neither one has chance of winning in the private corporate election because they were not hand-picked by the private powers-that-be! Think about it: When was the last time that a candidate was hand-picked by North American national peoples and won anything? NEVER! These elections are for the private UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATIONS! See my Genealogy of United States of America Corporations in www.sharonleeshields.com
ReplyDelete~Eagleinflight